Re: [hash2][review] Early review (due to holidays)

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-12-06 15:57:20

Vinnie Falco wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 7:33 AM Peter Dimov <pdimov_at_[hidden]
> <mailto:pdimov_at_[hidden]> > wrote:
> 
> 	No, the public-facing design doesn't change.
> `BOOST_CXX14_CONSTEXPR` is
> 	replaced by the less ugly `constexpr` and that's pretty much it.
> 
> 
> 
> My next question is for those individuals who proclaim that requiring C++14
> and later is ok. What is the specific rationale you used to determine whether
> the loss of users is worth the benefit of "BOOST_CXX14_CONSTEXPR replaced
> by the less ugly constexpr`?"

They don't need a rationale. I'm asking their opinions on whether a C++14
requirement would be fine _for them_. Not asking them to speculate whether
a C++14 requirement wouldn't be fine _for some unspecified other people_.