Boost logo

Boost :

From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-12-06 16:19:37


On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 7:57 AM Peter Dimov <pdimov_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> They don't need a rationale. I'm asking their opinions on whether a C++14
> requirement would be fine _for them_. Not asking them to speculate whether
> a C++14 requirement wouldn't be fine _for some unspecified other people_.
>

When I read "Do people care about C++11 support in hash2" I interpret
"people" as "unspecified other people". And when I read "would it be
acceptable to impose a minimum requirement of C++14" I understand this to
be asking if it is acceptable to impose the C++14 requirement on everyone.
My apologies for the misunderstanding.

Thanks


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk