Re: Decimal: Formal review begins.

From: Peter Turcan (peterturcan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2025-01-21 18:26:09

John,

>From an information/education perspective - ACCEPT - conditionally on the
few key doc updates mentioned in my intro.

Good luck with the review process!

- Peter

On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 1:30 AM John Maddock via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On 21/01/2025 05:53, Peter Turcan via Boost wrote:
> > John
> >
> > Here is my review of the Decimal library documentation. I am the
> Technical
> > Writer for the CppAlliance.
> >
> > I appreciate the effort that has gone in to try to make this doc set
> > complete.
> >
> > Main issues for me are the absence of a table of contents for the docs
> > (though perhaps a build script will create this?), moving the finance
> > examples to a much higher profile position within the docs - as this
> seems
> > to be the main use case, perhaps articulating other compelling (or author
> > favorite) use cases, and sentences explaining what the given
> > examples/functions/macros do.
> >
> > Hope the following review helps!
>
> Thank you Peter, but I don't see a conclusion (accept/reject/conditional
> etc)?
>
> Best, John.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>