|
Boost : |
From: Ivan Matek (libbooze_at_[hidden])
Date: 2025-01-21 18:26:57
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 7:12â¯PM Matt Borland <matt_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Every uint_fastXX_t or int_fastXX replaced by uintXX_t or intXX_t:
>
> Interesting that it is slower. Could be just random optimizer noise... but
without a deep dive to look into generated asm and profile it is a bit
tricky to know why. I would also try the middle ground(32 bit) in cases
where this change went from 64 bit integer to 16 bit integer.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk