Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] Query regarding boostbook and documentation
From: Soul Studios (matt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-01-09 21:53:03
> b) DOxygen is here to stay. I would like to see
> someone take up the challenge of making an extension
> which supports type requirements (aka concepts).
> From the users point of view, this would look like
> the following:
I personally would not want to see Doxygen becoming a requirement,
though I understand many like it. Personally I find it an impediment to
writing clean, readable code.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-11-11 08:50:41 UTC