Re: [Boost-docs] Query regarding boostbook and documentation

Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] Query regarding boostbook and documentation
From: Raffi Enficiaud (raffi.enficiaud_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-01-10 21:18:51

Le 09/01/16 22:53, Soul Studios a écrit :
>> b) DOxygen is here to stay.  I would like to see
>> someone take up the challenge of making an extension
>> which supports type requirements (aka concepts).
>>  From the users point of view, this would look like
>> the following:
>
> I personally would not want to see Doxygen becoming a requirement,
> though I understand many like it. Personally I find it an impediment to
> writing clean, readable code.

To clarify a bit: I never suggested Doxygen be a requirement. I am just 
saying that /if you want or need/, you can use it together with 
quickbook, and this chain of action is quite well supported already by 
the boost machinery.

Best,
Raffi