Re: [glas] Re: Welcome to the "glas" mailing list
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-12-10 14:54:15
Toon Knapen wrote:
> It might indeed be best to make the ml all open. I started with the
> settings as described above because I'm unsure if a totally open ml
> would be a problem for some partners. Especially large corporations
> might have very strict policies regarding posting to (public)
> mailinglists. And I think all current partners are very valuable to the
> project. BTW, are'nt the mailings of the C++ commitee not publicly
> accessible for the same reason?
> But if an all-open ml does not seem to be a problem to anyone we will
> change the policy. OK ?
If we can just agree that you will grant membership to any boost
participant/reader who asks, that's enough for me.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com