Glas :Re: [glas] [crossposting] glas and mtl4 - what are the commons and differences |
From: Karl Meerbergen (karl.meerbergen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-14 14:52:17
Dear Maik,
Peter and I will look into this. I am not sure that GLAS and MTL have
the same goals, but there is a large amount of overlap, especially in
the algorithms and containers, which should clearly be exploited.
Bindings are indeed useful. They are used in GLAS for interfacing with
the BLAS.
Best wishes,
Karl
Maik Beckmann wrote:
> Hello dear mtl4 and glas people
>
> I know ublas,
> - http://www.boost.org/libs/numeric/ublas/doc/index.htm
> its potential successor glas (my impression)
> - http://sourceforge.net/projects/glas
> and since yesterday mtl4
> - http://www.osl.iu.edu/research/mtl/mtl4/
>
> ublas is the lib I use today. My impression is that glas is the implemented by
> peoples (mainly Karl Meerbergen) who worked on ublas and want to rewrite it
> from scratch with C++0x in mind.
>
> On the other side theres mtl4, which will be the successor mtl2 (mainly
> developed by Peter Gottschling).
>
> What are the common goals and what are the differences between both template
> libs?
>
> The first thing I noticed is that both started using C++0x concepts and it
> might be a good idea to share experiences on this very new area of C++
> programming.
>
> Another thing are blas/lapack backends like atlas. I think the numeric
> bindings contained by boost-sandbox do a very good job.
>
> Regards,
> - Maik Beckmann
> _______________________________________________
> glas mailing list
> glas_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/glas
>