Re: [ublas] Transition to default handling of possible lvalue aliases

From: Georg Baum (Georg.Baum_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-20 01:55:14

Am Montag, 20. Juni 2005 07:45 schrieb Kresimir Fresl:
> Dan Elliott wrote:
> > Michael Stevens wrote:
> >>Would the change of semantics be a big problem for anyone?
> >
> > I would like to express my feeling it is good library behavior to
> > *always* provide the correct answer while *allowing* the intelligent
> > user to optimize.  I am under the impression that uBLAS, in its current
> > state, gives us both.  Therefore, although this has been an
> > enlightening, necessary conversation, I fear it is going to yield no
> > additional features while decreasing its usability.
>
> Agreed.

Me too.

Georg