Re: [ublas] Transition to default handling of possible lvalue aliases

From: Michael Stevens (mail_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-20 02:46:43

On Monday 20 June 2005 08:55, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Montag, 20. Juni 2005 07:45 schrieb Kresimir Fresl:
> > Dan Elliott wrote:
> > > Michael Stevens wrote:
> > >>Would the change of semantics be a big problem for anyone?
> > >
> > > I would like to express my feeling it is good library behavior to
> > > *always* provide the correct answer while *allowing* the intelligent
> > > user to optimize.  I am under the impression that uBLAS, in its current
> > > state, gives us both.  Therefore, although this has been an
> > > enlightening, necessary conversation, I fear it is going to yield no
> > > additional features while decreasing its usability.
> >
> > Agreed.
>
> Me too.
>

Votes in so far.

For : Me, Ian, Christopher (I assume)
Against : Dan, Kres, Greog