From: Michael Stevens (mail_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-21 11:50:12
On Thursday, 20. April 2006 17:20, Andreas Dolfen wrote:
> > A couple of things you could look at. uBLAS has bench1-4. If you are only
> > using Dense matrices then it would be sufficient to just compile up
> > bench1 for both versions and compare results. This may give us a better
> > idea of which operations are suffering.
> I just did that. The results are attached. It seems that the bench1
> program shows the same performance degradation. I used:
> export TOOLS=vacpp
> bjam "-sBUILD=release"
> for both boost libraries only changing the include-dirs.
The timing resolution is very low with most times around 0.01s. You can run
bench1 with an argument to increase the number of times everything is
Although it does look like the 1_33_1 are slower the results are a bit odd.
The c_array results are around 0s, but maybe this is just a resolution
-- ___________________________________ Michael Stevens Systems Engineering 34128 Kassel, Germany Phone/Fax: +49 561 5218038 Navigation Systems, Estimation and Bayesian Filtering http://bayesclasses.sf.net ___________________________________