Re: [ublas] real_type

From: Neal Becker (ndbecker2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-23 07:21:25

Russ wrote:

> Russ <c.r.coggrave <at> phasevision.com> writes:
> 
>> 
>> I would be grateful if someone could please clarify the interpretation of
>> real_type as used in the uBlas code.
>> 
>> Is it intended to indicate the type of the real component of a value, as
> opposed
>> to the type of the imaginary component?
>> 
>> OR
>> 
>> Is it intended to indicate a floating point number type?
> 
> 
> On further analysis, it looks like the former.
> 
> 

It should be called scalar_t.