Re: [ublas] CVS updates (please update and report regressions)

From: Karl Meerbergen (Karl.Meerbergen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-18 11:58:35

Kresimir Fresl wrote:

>Karl Meerbergen wrote:
>
>  
>
>>What is your point?
>>    
>>
>
>You said: "The implementation of leading_dimension() should not rely on 
>size_m, but rather on size1() and size2() depending on the orientation 
>of the matrix."
>
>Original version (that is, all versions prior to revision 1.16) did not 
>rely on size_m, but on size2(). So why did you change size2() into 
>size_M(), as quoted CVS log shows, if you think that it "is a problem"?
>
>fres
>_______________________________________________
>ublas mailing list
>ublas_at_[hidden]
>http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
>  
>

What I should have said: size1() and size2() of the ublas::matrix, not 
functor_type. size1() and size2() do no longer exist in functor_type, so 
that is why they had to be changed into size_m.

What I meant is that we can implement the bindings using size1() and 
size() of ublas::matrix(), which makes the bindings independent of ublas 
internals.

Karl