|
|
Ublas : |
From: Mike Hayford (mike_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-22 11:28:31
Thank you Fres and Karl for agreeing to this. I'm not sure what the
official Boost practice is, but it seems replacing the current copyright
header comments with a more standard Boost copyright header is one step.
Would someone with access to the bindings repository do this or put it
on a list of things to do?
Thanks
Mike
Karl Meerbergen wrote:
> Quoting Kresimir Fresl <fresl_at_[hidden]>:
>
>> Mike Hayford wrote:
>>
>>
>>> There is an additional issue that stands in the way of usage for
>>>
>> some of
>>
>>> us, and that it that the bindings don't appear to be covered by the
>>>
>>> Boost license. The header files have the right kind of reassuring
>>>
>> words
>>
>>> in them, but what is reassuring to me and what is reassuring to my
>>>
>>> company's attorneys are two different things. Would Kresimir Fresl,
>>>
>> Toon
>>
>>> Knapen and Karl Meerbergen consider changing the bindings to the
>>>
>> Boost
>>
>>> license?
>>>
>> I agree.
>>
>> fres
>>
>>
>
> OK for me.
>
> Karl
> _______________________________________________
> ublas mailing list
> ublas_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
>
>
>