|
|
Ublas : |
From: Karl Meerbergen (karl.meerbergen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-25 17:03:59
Hi James,
I will look at your contribution, hopefully this week.
Kresimir, Toon and I have found several inconsistencies. The library
needs tidying up. Also, the BLAS and LAPACK bindings should be
completed, since many routines do not have a binding, but this is a lot
of work. I do not believe this is going to happen soon.
We are currently writing some kind of manual. This has already uncovered
several missing parts and inconsistencies.
Thanks for your contribution
Karl
nate wrote:
> Two questions actually.
>
> Was the lack of BGL in ublas issue every resolved? Little more was posted to
> the developers list after the
> issue was posted on this list.
>
> Does anyone have write access to the bindings library in the sandbox? What is
> the current status of this
> library? I would be willing to work on this if anyone has any ideas for
> moving this library forward. I think
> its really quite useful.
>
> I've attached a patch that fixes a few errors in the blas1.hpp file of the
> blas bindings. Some
> inconsistencies led to errors when the bindings we used with a c_array.
>
> James
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> ublas mailing list
> ublas_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
>