|
|
Ublas : |
From: nate (nate_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-25 17:08:23
Thanks. I realized the patch I attached to last email had a problem with it.
I've included the corrected
version in this mail.
I've been working on completing the lapack bindings as I need functions that
are not in the library yet.
They need to be cleaned up, but I can make them available if that would help.
Thanks
James
>===== Original Message From Karl Meerbergen <karl.meerbergen_at_[hidden]>
=====
>Hi James,
>
>I will look at your contribution, hopefully this week.
>
>Kresimir, Toon and I have found several inconsistencies. The library
>needs tidying up. Also, the BLAS and LAPACK bindings should be
>completed, since many routines do not have a binding, but this is a lot
>of work. I do not believe this is going to happen soon.
>
>We are currently writing some kind of manual. This has already uncovered
>several missing parts and inconsistencies.
>
>Thanks for your contribution
>
>Karl
>
>
>nate wrote:
>> Two questions actually.
>>
>> Was the lack of BGL in ublas issue every resolved? Little more was posted
to
>> the developers list after the
>> issue was posted on this list.
>>
>> Does anyone have write access to the bindings library in the sandbox? What
is
>> the current status of this
>> library? I would be willing to work on this if anyone has any ideas for
>> moving this library forward. I think
>> its really quite useful.
>>
>> I've attached a patch that fixes a few errors in the blas1.hpp file of the
>> blas bindings. Some
>> inconsistencies led to errors when the bindings we used with a c_array.
>>
>> James
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ublas mailing list
>> ublas_at_[hidden]
>> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
>>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>ublas mailing list
>ublas_at_[hidden]
>http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas