From: Nico Galoppo (ngaloppo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-10 15:59:35
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Jesse Manning <manning.jesse_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> One good way to make sure this is the case is
> to agree on a unit testing framework to use for test implementation. My
> personal preference for a unit test framework is UnitTest++, but I know
> boost itself has a testing framework that might be more convenient to use.
> I have included a link to an article giving a good detailed description
> of different unit test frameworks.
Given that ublas is a boost library, is there any good reason not to
use the boost unit test library to do this? The one good reason that I
can think of in favor of the boost unit test library, is that it saves
us from installing yet another library.
The disadvantage is that the boost unit test library is a binary
library, not header-only.
-- Nico Galoppo :: http://www.ngaloppo.org