Re: [ublas] [bindings] Routine with 4 workarrays

Subject: Re: [ublas] [bindings] Routine with 4 workarrays
From: Rutger ter Borg (rutger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-17 08:08:59

Karl Meerbergen wrote:
> In the case of  DGGSVP, I would not use 3 but two workarrays: WORK and
> TAU can be held by a single double array, that you will have to
> partition in two subarrays.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Karl

In case of ggsvp it can be reduced to a workspace containing fewer types.
However, I think I just found an example which justifies the existance for
a workspace4<> ... :-)  it's {c,z}ggevx, it needs workarrays of 

 * Complex 
 * Real
 * Integer
 * Boolean

types.

Cheers, 

Rutger