Re: [ublas] [bindings] Routine with 4 workarrays

Subject: Re: [ublas] [bindings] Routine with 4 workarrays
From: Peter Schmitteckert (peter_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-18 03:25:14

Dear Rutger,

Rutger ter Borg schrieb:
> Karl Meerbergen wrote:
>> In the case of  DGGSVP, I would not use 3 but two workarrays: WORK and
>> TAU can be held by a single double array, that you will have to
>> partition in two subarrays.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Karl
> 
> In case of ggsvp it can be reduced to a workspace containing fewer types.
> However, I think I just found an example which justifies the existance for
> a workspace4<> ... :-)  it's {c,z}ggevx, it needs workarrays of 
> 
>  * Complex 
>  * Real
>  * Integer
>  * Boolean
> 

still you could use workspace4<> merging Complex  and Real in a single array.

Best regards,
Peter