- Boost - lists.boost.org

Trouble with constructors boost::graph::directed_graph from boost::adjacency_list in C++
by Matthias Beste 31 Jan '14

31 Jan '14

Dear Boost-Users, Related to: boost::graph::directed_graph I've trouble with the Constructors of above as a simple example shows: <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< using namespace boost; typedef directed_graph<> Directed_Graphtype; class Mywrapper { private: Directed_Graphtype g; public: Mywrapper() : g() {}; }; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I got the following Error while compiling: <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< HOME/svn_repos/collab_cntfet/trunk/STA_signalintegrity/circuitGraph.h|78| instanziiert von hier| /usr/include/boost/graph/directed_graph.hpp|96|Fehler: keine passende Funktion für Aufruf von »boost::adjacency_list<boost::listS, boost::listS, boost::bidirectionalS, boost::property<boost::vertex_index_t, unsigned int, boost::no_property>, boost::property<boost::edge_index_t, unsigned int, boost::no_property>, boost::no_property, boost::listS>::adjacency_list(const boost::directed_graph<>&)«| /usr/include/boost/graph/directed_graph.hpp|96|Anmerkung: Kandidaten sind:| /usr/include/boost/graph/adjacency_list.hpp|451|Anmerkung: template<class EdgeIterator, class EdgePropertyIterator> boost::adjacency_list::adjacency_list(EdgeIterator, EdgeIterator, EdgePropertyIterator, boost::adjacency_list<OutEdgeListS, VertexListS, DirectedS, VertexProperty, EdgeProperty, GraphProperty, EdgeListS>::vertices_size_type, boost::adjacency_list<OutEdgeListS, VertexListS, DirectedS, VertexProperty, EdgeProperty, GraphProperty, EdgeListS>::edges_size_type, const GraphProperty&)| /usr/include/boost/graph/adjacency_list.hpp|443|Anmerkung: template<class EdgeIterator> boost::adjacency_list::adjacency_list(EdgeIterator, EdgeIterator, boost::adjacency_list<OutEdgeListS, VertexListS, DirectedS, VertexProperty, EdgeProperty, GraphProperty, EdgeListS>::vertices_size_type, boost::adjacency_list<OutEdgeListS, VertexListS, DirectedS, VertexProperty, EdgeProperty, GraphProperty, EdgeListS>::edges_size_type, const GraphProperty&)| /usr/include/boost/graph/adjacency_list.hpp|435|Anmerkung: boost::adjacency_list<OutEdgeListS, VertexListS, DirectedS, VertexProperty, EdgeProperty, GraphProperty, EdgeListS>::adjacency_list(boost::adjacency_list<OutEdgeListS, VertexListS, DirectedS, VertexProperty, EdgeProperty, GraphProperty, EdgeListS>::vertices_size_type, const GraphProperty&) [with OutEdgeListS = boost::listS, VertexListS = boost::listS, DirectedS = boost::bidirectionalS, VertexProperty = boost::property<boost::vertex_index_t, unsigned int, boost::no_property>, EdgeProperty = boost::property<boost::edge_index_t, unsigned int, boost::no_property>, GraphProperty = boost::no_property, EdgeListS = boost::listS, boost::adjacency_list<OutEdgeListS, VertexListS, DirectedS, VertexProperty, EdgeProperty, GraphProperty, EdgeListS>::vertices_size_type = long unsigned int]| /usr/include/boost/graph/adjacency_list.hpp|435|Anmerkung: keine bekannte Umwandlung für Argument 1 von »const boost::directed_graph<>« nach »long unsigned int«| /usr/include/boost/graph/adjacency_list.hpp|418|Anmerkung: boost::adjacency_list<OutEdgeListS, VertexListS, DirectedS, VertexProperty, EdgeProperty, GraphProperty, EdgeListS>::adjacency_list(const boost::adjacency_list<OutEdgeListS, VertexListS, DirectedS, VertexProperty, EdgeProperty, GraphProperty, EdgeListS>&) [with OutEdgeListS = boost::listS, VertexListS = boost::listS, DirectedS = boost::bidirectionalS, VertexProperty = boost::property<boost::vertex_index_t, unsigned int, boost::no_property>, EdgeProperty = boost::property<boost::edge_index_t, unsigned int, boost::no_property>, GraphProperty = boost::no_property, EdgeListS = boost::listS, boost::adjacency_list<OutEdgeListS, VertexListS, DirectedS, VertexProperty, EdgeProperty, GraphProperty, EdgeListS> = boost::adjacency_list<boost::listS, boost::listS, boost::bidirectionalS, boost::property<boost::vertex_index_t, unsigned int, boost::no_property>, boost::property<b oost::edg e_index_t, unsigned int, boost::no_property>, boost::no_property, boost::listS>]| /usr/include/boost/graph/adjacency_list.hpp|418|Anmerkung: keine bekannte Umwandlung für Argument 1 von »const boost::directed_graph<>« nach »const boost::adjacency_list<boost::listS, boost::listS, boost::bidirectionalS, boost::property<boost::vertex_index_t, unsigned int, boost::no_property>, boost::property<boost::edge_index_t, unsigned int, boost::no_property>, boost::no_property, boost::listS>&«| /usr/include/boost/graph/adjacency_list.hpp|414|Anmerkung: boost::adjacency_list<OutEdgeListS, VertexListS, DirectedS, VertexProperty, EdgeProperty, GraphProperty, EdgeListS>::adjacency_list(const GraphProperty&) [with OutEdgeListS = boost::listS, VertexListS = boost::listS, DirectedS = boost::bidirectionalS, VertexProperty = boost::property<boost::vertex_index_t, unsigned int, boost::no_property>, EdgeProperty = boost::property<boost::edge_index_t, unsigned int, boost::no_property>, GraphProperty = boost::no_property, EdgeListS = boost::listS]| /usr/include/boost/graph/adjacency_list.hpp|414|Anmerkung: keine bekannte Umwandlung für Argument 1 von »const boost::directed_graph<>« nach »const boost::no_property&«| ||=== Build finished: 11 errors, 0 warnings ===| >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would really like to know, where the problem is with this templates. The default constructor exists of course for boost::directed_graph and boost::adjacency_list a.s.o. ... however the compiler don't like them. This is confusing. Can someone help me out? Kind Regards Matthias -- Dipl.-Ing. Matthias Beste Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter Lehrstuhl für Dependable Nano Computing (CDNC) Institute für technische Informatik (ITEC) Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) Haid-und-Neu Str.7 (Bldg 07.21) 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany Phone: +49 721 608-45009; Fax: +49 721 608-43962 Email: matthias.beste(at)kit.edu <mailto:matthias.beste@kit.edu> web: http://cdnc.itec.kit.edu/

1 0

[cmake] Plans/status
by Ruslan Baratov 31 Jan '14

31 Jan '14

Hello everyone! I want to ask few questions about this project: https://github.com/boost-cmake/boost-cmake I start with simple one, what is the current status of this project and are there any plans to apply it to the mainline?

1 0

Boost Phoenix 3.0.1 - version numbers and ChangeLog
by Fletcher, John P 31 Jan '14

31 Jan '14

Boost Phoenix 3.0.1 is now on master. I am fixing the bugs previously reported for Boost Phoenix. I have started a file libs/phoenix/ChangeLog (following the example in wave) to log changes made. I am incrementing the lowest number of the version when I merge changes to master and origin/master and also changing the version number in Phoenix and reporting this in the ChangeLog. I hope this will make it easier in the future to keep track of exactly which version it is which is causing a problem. I would welcome any comments on the TODO list in the ChangeLog, in particular where there are problems caused by phoenix for other libraries. I am aware that this applies to boost/log. I am hopeful that some fixes of early bug reports will help with later bugs as well. I have just fixed 5715 which related to the comma operator in statement blocks, and can be fixed with the addition of a header. This fixes a silent error in the execution as compared with phoenix V2 and may well fix other problems. That fix is still in develop and not master until some tests have been done. John Fletcher

1 0

Ownership of tickets for Boost Phoenix
by Fletcher, John P 31 Jan '14

31 Jan '14

I have taken over as maintainer of Boost Phoenix and have started to fix the reported bugs. How do I get to be the owner of the bugs so that I can change their status when they have been fixed and tested? Also how can I be sure to get notification of new bug reports? John Fletcher

1 0

[program_options] documentation for validators
by Alain Miniussi 30 Jan '14

30 Jan '14

Hi, I have a question regarding the validators namespace of program_options documentation. That namespace is referenced in the tutorial in http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_55_0/doc/html/program_options/howto.html and some of its functions are used but there is no documentation related with that namespace. Actually, it does not even appears in the reference manual of the lib. Is that intended ? Regards Alain

2 1

[spirit.lex] 9580
by Vyacheslav Andrejev 30 Jan '14

30 Jan '14

Hi All, Can somebody take a look at bug #9580? It's a C++ puzzle. Two as if equivalent expressions demonstrate different behavior. This one auto expr = (this->self("SOME_STATE") += someTokenDef); calls boost::proto::detail::exprns_::operator +=. However this auto lex_def = this->self("SOME_STATE"); auto expr = (lex_def += someTokenDef); calls boost::spirit::lex::detail::operator +=. My guess is that it changes templates instantiaon order, but still I can't explain it and thus can't fix it. -- -- Vyacheslav Andrejev

2 3

Help please with Boost Discussion Policy
by Fletcher, John P 30 Jan '14

30 Jan '14

It has been pointed out to me that I need to change my habits from top posting to be conformant to the Boost Discussion Policy http://www.boost.org/community/policy.html I accept this fully and I am seeking some guidance how to achieve this. At my place of work our email client is Microsoft Outlook 2010 and the normal practice is top posting. When I am at home I can access the same system via a web email client which does the same thing. The Boost policy document reffers to Quote-Fix (http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/ ) which was last updated in 2006 and does not work with current versions of Outlook. There is also this: http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/macros4outlook/index.php?title=QuoteF… I am doing most of my Boost work from home and want to be able to communicate freely. Ideally what I want to do is to switch between the styles so that only my Boost and related work is in quoted style. Any help will be much appreciated. Thank you John Fletcher

11 15

[config] Removing support for old compilers: do we have a consensus yet?
by John Maddock 30 Jan '14

30 Jan '14

Folks, As you know Boost.Config has had it's support for old compilers stripped out, and this is a controversial change. We're now at the point where I'd really like to get the routine changes/updates into release, but to do that we need a final decision on whether to keep (and release) Steven Kelly's changes in develop. So do we have a final decision? Thanks, John.

6 8

[fusion] preprocess target pull request
by Eric Niebler 29 Jan '14

29 Jan '14

https://github.com/boostorg/fusion/pull/1 I'm not sure who gets notified of pull requests, if anybody. Sending mail for good measure. -- Eric Niebler Boost.org http://www.boost.org

6 14

[offtopic] C++Now 2014 - hotel room available
by Hartmut Kaiser 29 Jan '14

29 Jan '14

I apologize for posting off-topic. Hey all, Unfortunately I will not be able to come to C++Now this year. However I already booked my hotel room at the Aspen Meadows (at the early bird rate!). If anybody is interested in using the hotel reservation, please get in contact with me offline. Thanks! Regards Hartmut --------------- http://boost-spirit.com http://stellar.cct.lsu.edu

2 1