27 Jun
2026
27 Jun
'26
5:54 a.m.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 7:51 PM Peter Dimov via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
This has to be a misunderstanding. Establishing this protocol and testing it in practice was definitely a goal for Capy, and the most important one (for me at least.)
Yes well I already conceded that the library was not documented correctly. So then I will ask what is the correct way to present Capy? And how should it be evaluated? Thanks