22 Jun
2026
22 Jun
'26
4:07 p.m.
On Sat, Jun 20, 2026 at 6:38 AM Glen Fernandes via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
If the underlying library is rejected but the high level one isn't, then the recommendation is for the former to just be an implementation detail of the latter.
The two libraries really should be considered as a single work that have a structural separation. I write about the motivation for this separation here: *Why Capy Is Separate* https://develop.capy.cpp.al/capy/9.design/9b.Separation.html Thanks