30 Jun
2026
30 Jun
'26
4:28 p.m.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 11:50 PM Rainer Deyke via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On 6/29/26 17:46, Christian Mazakas via Boost wrote:
These results seem a little suspicious to me. Rust is 4.62x slower?
Doesn't surprise me. Rust has always been willing to pay the cost of runtime safety rails where compile-time checks are inadequate.
It actually should surprise you. Personally, I think it's a little unwise to attempt to publish numbers without actually understanding the benchmarks in question. It's poor form to say profiling is out of scope but still publish numbers anyway. - Christian