Here is my second review of the Boost.Multi library, per changes in https://github.com/correaa/boost-multi/issues/153, documentation, and recent commits at https://github.com/correaa/boost-multi/commits/develop/. The documentation now clearer than before, have extensive examples on library usage, though some context between the examples would be great as well. I also see that my changes were taken into account per PR 153. Recent commit shows several hardening of the library, which is always welcome. However per previous messages (c.f Rainer' messages) I see several improvements to be made in what Rainer said. Which I why I choose to vote CONDITIONALLY ACCEPT the library due to the substantial improvements and needed improvements it has received. Best, Amlal El Mahrouss ## References: - [1] https://github.com/correaa/boost-multi/commit/74fa6d6762255c9239a7311c9b1765... - [2] https://github.com/correaa/boost-multi/issues/153