El 26/10/2026 a las 11:14, Andrey Semashev via Boost escribió:
On 26 Oct 2026 13:05, Vinnie Falco wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 3:02 AM Andrey Semashev via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org <mailto:boost@lists.boost.org>> wrote:
Please, don't spam the ML with this. Make it a separate subscription for those who are interested. ML is for human communication, not for activity reports or similar notifications/spam.
I think its pretty insulting to call it spam. Joaquin, and others, are trying to provide a useful service with value to the authors. Insulting his work is demotivating, I didn't insult anyone. And for that matter, I didn't say it wasn't useful (to anyone). I said it was not appropriate for this list and suggested to move it elsewhere. And yes, being an automated mass notification activity, it is spam by definition.
The _production_ of the report uses an AI tool (a Claude skill, if people are curious). After the report is produced in my machine, I review it, change whatever I feel needs changing and then send it to the ML by hand. Does this procedure still qualify as spam in your estimation? Joaquín M López Muñoz