[boost] Re: Capy Review

On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 12:09 PM Christian Mazakas via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:

First off, congrats.

Thanks

So basically, we _are_ reviewing _two_ separate Boost libraries here. In principle, I think this is fine but it's just confusing to muddy those waters. Rainer's review stands then, and isn't a scope error. He has no onus to look at Corosio.

I have to go where the evidence leads and you are right on this. Yet "Capy is useless" and "Capy should not be public" are both provably false statements. We have not done a good job documenting Capy's value proposition, this is a real problem. It is also a difficult problem. Regards