Thank you to the FSC for putting this together! Getting a summary of cross-repo changes in the ecosystem is very useful. As a maintainer, I definitely see myself looking at it to get an idea of what is moving around me. It's about 5mn of reading per week, so it's doable. Weekly cadence and ~1,150 words is comparable to what LWN or “This Week in Rust” do, and those are well liked (although a bit different in format and nature) - https://lwn.net/ - https://this-week-in-rust.org/ It is useful to surface elements that would be costly to investigate personally, like the adjacency_list serialization break, or the Intrusive move assignment behavior change. It credits contributors by name, which is useful for community building and visibility. I was happy to see several BGL contributors (several new ones!) being credited. The predictable structure will allow us to rapidly scan and locate the information we need. That being said, what could possible diminish its interest is length creep of the lib(s) highlight. Also I wonder if the "Numbers" section is very useful, I'm unsure what I could do with this. But as a first iteration it's very well done! Some people on the ML might find the frequency too high and perceive this report as spam which would be a shame given its quality. I'd encourage everyone to share kind and constructive feedback on how they perceive it, because the alternative is making user-oriented decisions blindly, at the risk of frustrated users leaving the ML. Decisions based on user feedback are the best we can do for them :) One proxy we could use is to post this one report on Reddit and poll the community about its perceived usefulness and possible improvements. It could be a way to gather feedback on the initiative. I am now wondering if I should start a Boost.Graph Monthly News on the Github Discussions. That would be an interesting way to interact with users and contributors regarding the repo's ongoing dynamics and direction. Thanks again to the FSC for this initiative, Best wishes, Arnaud Becheler