On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 11:10 AM Vinnie Falco <vinnie.falco@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 10:31 AM Christian Mazakas via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
...Capy shouldn't be public.
eh...CERN seems to like Capy
https://github.com/cern-nextgen/wp1.7-traccc/pull/18
They don't use Corosio.
First off, congrats. Second, this confuses me because before you were just saying that it was unfair to review Capy without reviewing Corosio and that they should be thought of as "one logical library". That doesn't seem to be the case at all. So basically, we _are_ reviewing _two_ separate Boost libraries here. In principle, I think this is fine but it's just confusing to muddy those waters. Rainer's review stands then, and isn't a scope error. He has no onus to look at Corosio. - Christian