Subject: Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #12867: log library extensions
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-02-27 08:36:50
#12867: log library extensions
-------------------------------+--------------------------
Reporter: vgrinenko@⦠| Owner: andysem
Type: Feature Requests | Status: new
Milestone: To Be Determined | Component: log
Version: Boost 1.57.0 | Severity: Optimization
Resolution: | Keywords:
-------------------------------+--------------------------
Comment (by vgrinenko@â¦):
> a max age specification instead of a predicate.
I was trying to do similar to your implementation and more or less
âgenericâ: max age or older than specific time or something else.
> The record-based renaming seems too specific to me...
I agree, probably it would be better provide âgeneric file manipulationâ
possibility instead of renaming and allow to do something with m_File in
the predicate, for example copy, move, close and open new log dependently
from the record content. In this case the predicate itself will be
responsible for the implementation and robustness and risks, not a
library.
But it is just an idea.
Thanks for the answer and good luck!
-- Ticket URL: <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/12867#comment:2> Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/> Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-02-27 08:40:15 UTC