Subject: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #13165: inplace_ptr
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-17 10:43:35
#13165: inplace_ptr
------------------------------+----------------------------
Reporter: gast128@⦠| Owner: Peter Dimov
Type: Feature Requests | Status: new
Milestone: To Be Determined | Component: smart_ptr
Version: Boost 1.64.0 | Severity: Not Applicable
Keywords: |
------------------------------+----------------------------
Boost.Optional uses in place object creation. In many cases it could used
as a drop in repelacment of scoped_ptr with the benefit of circumventing a
memory allocation and locality of memory access.
However its semantics is 'optional' and not like a fast replacement of
scoped_ptr. Wouldn't it be an idea to add something like this to the
smart_ptr library? Names can be e.g. inplace_ptr, value_ptr, etc. We could
also use Boost.Optional but colleagues might get confused, since you do
not use the 'optional' aspect but its performance aspect.
Note that people might wonder why not use value based directly, but there
are still some use cases:
* for pimpl idiom / hide expansive headers (e.g. multi index) in client
* 2 phase construction, where information is not yet available at parent
constructor time.
Only drawback is that you lose polymorphism.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22636407/why-not-use-boostoptional-
as-a-better-scoped-ptr
-- Ticket URL: <https://svn.boost.org/trac10/boost/ticket/13165> Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/> Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-08-17 10:49:12 UTC