Re: [jamboost] Fwd: Re: Boost.Threads and Regression Testing

From: Rene Rivera (grafik666_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-28 18:14:34

On 2002-02-28 at 03:20 PM, david.abrahams_at_[hidden] (David Abrahams) wrote:

>I'm drowning. Rene, Vladimir, or someone else, could you take a shot at
>helping Bill (and Kevin Van Horn, who's asking questions on the regular
>boost list?)

OK, I'm looking at this, but here is a question...

Should depending on a target generate that dependant target according to the
dependee specification if by default it's not built. For example:

lib test-lib : file.cpp : <define>FOO=1 : debug release ;

exe test-exe : test.cpp <lib>test-lib : <define>FOO=0 : debug release
<runtime-link>static/dynamic ;

Should building test-exe also build test-lib/runtime-link-static and
test-lib/runtime-link-static ?

>Thanks, sorry,

No, problem. We all have only a limited time devote to things :-(

By the way, I think the discrepancy of the linking is my problem. I relaxed
the find-compatible-subvariant checks way too much.

-- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- rrivera_at_[hidden] - grafik_at_[hidden]
-- 102708583_at_icq - Grafik666_at_AIM - Grafik_at_[hidden]