From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-28 18:49:14
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rene Rivera" <grafik666_at_[hidden]>
> On 2002-02-28 at 03:20 PM, david.abrahams_at_[hidden] (David Abrahams) wrote:
> >I'm drowning. Rene, Vladimir, or someone else, could you take a shot at
> >helping Bill (and Kevin Van Horn, who's asking questions on the regular
> >boost list?)
> OK, I'm looking at this, but here is a question...
> Should depending on a target generate that dependant target according to
> dependee specification if by default it's not built. For example:
> lib test-lib : file.cpp : <define>FOO=1 : debug release ;
> exe test-exe : test.cpp <lib>test-lib : <define>FOO=0 : debug release
> <runtime-link>static/dynamic ;
> Should building test-exe also build test-lib/runtime-link-static and
> test-lib/runtime-link-static ?
Yes, that's the intended behavior.
> >Thanks, sorry,
> No, problem. We all have only a limited time devote to things :-(
> By the way, I think the discrepancy of the linking is my problem. I
> the find-compatible-subvariant checks way too much.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk