From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-07 04:02:01
Rene Rivera wrote:
> >I will update the main trunk and my area in the Perforce public depot,
> >and mark the 2.4 merge task completed!
> Should we increment the version number?
> I'll volunteer to do the ARGV variable. Questions on this: Should we have
> an ARGC? (I would think not) If not, should it be ARGS instead of ARGV?
No need for ARGC, I think. ARGS is slightly more better.
> How about the PWD builtin?
Made a commit to that effect. If anybody could check it with MSVC, this would
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk