Re: [jamboost] Short-circuit evaluation

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-07 04:02:01

Rene Rivera wrote:

> >I will update the main trunk and my area in the Perforce public depot,
> >and mark the 2.4 merge task completed!
>
> Cool...
>
> Should we increment the version number?

Guess so. 

> I'll volunteer to do the ARGV variable. Questions on this: Should we have
> an ARGC? (I would think not) If not, should it be ARGS instead of ARGV?

No need for ARGC, I think. ARGS is slightly more better.

> How about the PWD builtin?

Made a commit to that effect. If anybody could check it with MSVC, this would 
be great. 

- Volodya