Re: [jamboost] Latest Perforce changes for v2.4

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-07 04:08:58

David Abrahams wrote:
> I've merged in most of Perforce's latest stuff (yes, they keep moving
> the target) into the 'perforce_2_4_merge' branch. 
> It doesn't quite
> bootstrap yet; I'm not sure what the problem is.

Hmm.... looks like keeping in sync with Perforce is becoming problematic.Have 
no idea what to do with it.

> Worse, I think I failed to properly tag the branch before adding the
> latest Perforce stuff, though I tried.

Looks so. "perforce_2_4_merge_1" points to the trunk and there's no tags on 
the branch AFAIKT. I believe that I've placed a tag at the version that we 
had immediately after my change to 'while' behaviour and prior to merge with 
trunk. The tag is called "state-perforce_2_4_merge-1". 

One good thing about CVS is that one can remove/rename tags at any time :-)

- Volodya