Re: [jamboost] Short-circuit evaluation

From: Rene Rivera (grafik666_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-07 12:39:19

On 2002-03-07 at 07:45 AM, david.abrahams_at_[hidden] (David Abrahams) wrote:

>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Rene Rivera" <grafik666_at_[hidden]>
>
>> Should we increment the version number?
>
>Probably. Go ahead...

Done. It's now 3.1.

>> I'll volunteer to do the ARGV variable. Questions on this: Should we
>have an
>> ARGC? (I would think not) If not, should it be ARGS instead of ARGV?
>
>Python uses sys.argv, which is good enough for me. ARGS could mean any
>args, but ARGV means the program args.

Not a strong vote from Vlad for ARGS, and one agaist :-) This is in as ARGV.

One additional change I did for this was to allow options in the GNU style of
"--x". This way those options get passed in ARGV var, but ignored by Jam
itself.

-- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- rrivera_at_[hidden] - grafik_at_[hidden]
-- 102708583_at_icq - Grafik666_at_AIM - Grafik_at_[hidden]