Re: [jamboost] Short-circuit evaluation

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-07 07:45:05

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rene Rivera" <grafik666_at_[hidden]>

> Should we increment the version number?

Probably. Go ahead...

> I'll volunteer to do the ARGV variable. Questions on this: Should we
have an
> ARGC? (I would think not) If not, should it be ARGS instead of ARGV?

Python uses sys.argv, which is good enough for me. ARGS could mean any
args, but ARGV means the program args.

> How about the PWD builtin?

My hope was that as soon as we /actually/ caught up to Perforce, we'd
then integrate all of Matt Armstrong's changes wholesale; it's not clear
to me that it would be any easier for us to pick and choose.

-Dave