From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-03 08:26:05
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vladimir Prus" <ghost_at_[hidden]>
> Now that compose-requirements is found to be the same as
> can we go with 'apply-requirements' only?
I still don't think the name is right. The problem with "apply" is that
traditionally it means there is an operator and an operand. In other
words, we might apply a function to an argument or apply requirements to
a target. However, both arguments are requirements lists AFAICT, so I
think "refine" would be better.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk