From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-03 09:12:05
David Abrahams wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vladimir Prus" <ghost_at_[hidden]>
> > Now that compose-requirements is found to be the same as
> > can we go with 'apply-requirements' only?
> I still don't think the name is right. The problem with "apply" is that
> traditionally it means there is an operator and an operand. In other
> words, we might apply a function to an argument or apply requirements to
> a target. However, both arguments are requirements lists AFAICT, so I
> think "refine" would be better.
Just committed property.jam. The rule is now named 'refine-properties' - to
represent the fact that we'll use it both to refine build request and to
refine inherited requirements. Hope this is the final name.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk