Boost-Build :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Rene Rivera (grafik666_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-03 12:47:12

Next message: David Abrahams: "Re: [jamboost] redundancy?"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "redundancy?"
In reply to: David Abrahams: "redundancy?"
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "Re: [jamboost] redundancy?"
Reply: David Abrahams: "Re: [jamboost] redundancy?"

On 2002-05-03 at 12:31 PM, david.abrahams_at_[hidden] (David Abrahams) wrote:

>There appears to be some redundancy in project.dump vs.
>project-rules.print. Am I misinterpreting something here?

no not missing a thing ;-)

we could start using the print calls instead and get rid of the dump. we
just have to update the test case to account for the syntax chage.

-- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- rrivera_at_[hidden] - grafik_at_[hidden]
-- 102708583_at_icq - Grafik666_at_AIM - Grafik_at_[hidden]

Next message: David Abrahams: "Re: [jamboost] redundancy?"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "redundancy?"
In reply to: David Abrahams: "redundancy?"
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "Re: [jamboost] redundancy?"
Reply: David Abrahams: "Re: [jamboost] redundancy?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk