Boost-Build :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-03 12:54:54

Next message: Rene Rivera: "Re: [jamboost] redundancy?"
Previous message: Rene Rivera: "Re: [jamboost] redundancy?"
In reply to: Rene Rivera: "Re: [jamboost] redundancy?"
Next in thread: Rene Rivera: "Re: [jamboost] redundancy?"
Reply: Rene Rivera: "Re: [jamboost] redundancy?"

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rene Rivera" <grafik666_at_[hidden]>

> no not missing a thing ;-)
>
> we could start using the print calls instead and get rid of the dump.
we
> just have to update the test case to account for the syntax chage.

Please do!

-Dave

Next message: Rene Rivera: "Re: [jamboost] redundancy?"
Previous message: Rene Rivera: "Re: [jamboost] redundancy?"
In reply to: Rene Rivera: "Re: [jamboost] redundancy?"
Next in thread: Rene Rivera: "Re: [jamboost] redundancy?"
Reply: Rene Rivera: "Re: [jamboost] redundancy?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk