From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-13 07:37:17
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vladimir Prus" <ghost_at_[hidden]>
> Toon Knapen wrote:
> > I've recompiled all unix prebuilt jamboost exec's and have put them on
> > sourceforge server. I've uploaded bjam.gz for every platform.
> Great. I've uploaded Redhat rmps for jam and removed for now boost build
> rpms. The webpage is also updated. The only missing binary now is for
Super! Are you planning to make a windows install like you did the last
> > No I still need to updated the webpage with the links to the prebuilts'
> > I'm wondering if I should also keep a link to the old jam.gz (the old
> > boost.build and thus not a hard-link) or will thus just confuse people
> I think that the link should not be kept.
Yes, kill it, IMO. What would the point be?
Oh, suppose someone wanted to build an older boost release, one without
boost-build.jam in various places. Would it work with bjam? If not, we just
need to give them some new instructions; it's not so terrible.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk