From: Toon Knapen (toon.knapen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-13 09:28:53
On Monday 13 May 2002 14:37, David Abrahams wrote:
> > > I'm wondering if I should also keep a link to the old jam.gz (the old
> > > boost.build and thus not a hard-link) or will thus just confuse people
> > I think that the link should not be kept.
> Yes, kill it, IMO. What would the point be?
> Oh, suppose someone wanted to build an older boost release, one without
> boost-build.jam in various places. Would it work with bjam? If not, we just
> need to give them some new instructions; it's not so terrible.
OK. So for the moment, all links go to bjam.gz. The old jam.gz are still
there though should we get requests for jam exec's that can compile older
versions of Boost. I've added no note however about the old jam.gz.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk