Re: [jamboost] Build request interface

From: Rene Rivera (grafik666_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-11 10:51:39

On 2002-06-11 at 04:58 PM, ghost_at_[hidden] (Vladimir Prus) wrote:

>
>Hi,
>it was quiet here for a while, but now I think it's better to continue with 
>development. 

I also think it's time to get back to this :-)

>I'm looking at issue 552870: Complete initialization behaviour now
>(http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=552870&group_id=7586&atid=445591)
>and wondering what to do about "--toolset" and "--build". Would we like
both 
>options to be present, or to retain only latter, so that the user could 
>simply type
>
> bjam --build="gcc borland release debug"
>
>What do you think?

What set of builds will that produce?

gcc/release + gcc/debug + borland/release + borland/debug ?

If the case is we just multiply... Do we want to allow for a lesser set of
builds? Like gcc/release + borland/debug?

-- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- rrivera_at_[hidden] - grafik_at_[hidden]
-- 102708583_at_icq - Grafik666_at_AIM - Grafik_at_[hidden]