Re: [jamboost] intel-linux-tools.jam

From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-14 05:10:23

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dave,

On Friday 14 June 2002 12:03, David Abrahams wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Thomas Witt" <witt_at_[hidden]>
>
> > could you please revert your recent change to intel-linux-tools.jam. I
>
> firmly
>
> > believe that it is fundamentally wrong to have processor dependent
>
> settings
>
> > in the optimization flags. Speed is not an argument if correctness is
> > affected. Given the current state the tools will silently fail to create
> > valid code for Pentium processors. In my opinion this is _not_
>
> desireable.
>
> > If using -tpp6 is ok for you, put it in icc.cfg or icpc.cfg or add it to
>
> your
>
> > project settings.
>
> Hmm, that does sound like a mistake.

What do you refer to?

Thomas

- -- 
Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Witt
Institut fuer Verkehrswesen, Eisenbahnbau und -betrieb, Universitaet Hannover
voice: [phone] - 4273, fax: [phone]
http://www.ive.uni-hannover.de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9CcEU0ds/gS3XsBoRAlwYAJ4/zLBpqktjnN33hk+/ns3U2PYnTACeOohM
BghEDo+neELn5/w4VA4SzF0=
=xtlT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----