Re: [jamboost] intel-linux-tools.jam

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-14 05:28:48

----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Witt" <witt_at_[hidden]>

> > > affected. Given the current state the tools will silently fail to
create
> > > valid code for Pentium processors. In my opinion this is _not_
> >
> > desireable.
> >

> > Hmm, that does sound like a mistake.
>
> What do you refer to?

Sorry. I meant that Toon's change sounds like a mistake, if it causes
failures when targeting Pentiums.

-Dave