From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-18 05:58:58
From: "Thomas Witt" <witt_at_[hidden]>
> As Dave wasn't to enthusiastic about my signature I decided to use the
> backward compatible form. Changes aare in CVS now. Currently msvc
> is the only action that uses the new options argument to
Now that I see the code I understand why you wanted to change the
ordering. However, I don't think it's neccessarily worth doing things now
However, Whoa: I'm not at all sure I like the idea of making the options
into targets, even NOTFILE targets!
That really doesn't seem right to me...
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk