Re: [jamboost] Signature change with-command-file rule

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-18 05:58:58

From: "Thomas Witt" <witt_at_[hidden]>

> As Dave wasn't to enthusiastic about my signature I decided to use the
> backward compatible form. Changes aare in CVS now. Currently msvc
Link-action
> is the only action that uses the new options argument to
with-commandfile.

Now that I see the code I understand why you wanted to change the
ordering. However, I don't think it's neccessarily worth doing things now
differently.

However, Whoa: I'm not at all sure I like the idea of making the options
into targets, even NOTFILE targets!

That really doesn't seem right to me...

-Dave