Re: [jamboost] Signature change with-command-file rule

From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-18 06:16:00

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 18 June 2002 12:58, David Abrahams wrote:
>
> However, Whoa: I'm not at all sure I like the idea of making the options
> into targets, even NOTFILE targets!
>
> That really doesn't seem right to me...

Ok, I tell you what I try to achieve, you show me the right way and I fix it.

I made them targets, as this was the only way to get the command-file-dump-XX 
actions called for the options.

Thomas 

- -- 
Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Witt
Institut fuer Verkehrswesen, Eisenbahnbau und -betrieb, Universitaet Hannover
voice: [phone] - 4273, fax: [phone]
http://www.ive.uni-hannover.de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9DxZ00ds/gS3XsBoRAq2qAJ0R1nzh+DzwNdxWOxsFK3Fly+RslwCgkDxw
zCi3KlDq7OiMOsV70Bj2CKQ=
=QBHr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----