Re: [jamboost] symmetric/optional features

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-05 10:17:43

From: "Vladimir Prus" <ghost_at_[hidden]>

> David Abrahams wrote:
> > Fixed.
>
> Thank you. I've just made this new rule work together with the rest of
the
> code, so that non-optional non-free features are added to the build
request.
> I had to add "build-request.expand-with-defaults" rule, as otherwise that
> functionality would be present in two different places.

I think the right thing is to just fold all that functionality into
"expand". I was just reluctant to re-write all those tests which do the
expansion without the defaults, because I think they're valuable for the
purposes of checking that the implementation is working. Maybe you can help
resolve this tension somehow...

-Dave