Re: [jamboost] symmetric/optional features

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-05 10:34:32

David Abrahams wrote:
> From: "Vladimir Prus" <ghost_at_[hidden]>
>
> > > I think the right thing is to just fold all that functionality into
> > > "expand". I was just reluctant to re-write all those tests which do the
> > > expansion without the defaults, because I think they're valuable for
>
> the
>
> > > purposes of checking that the implementation is working.
> >
> > I understand you.
> >
> > > Maybe you can help resolve this tension somehow...
> >
> > Can't we just rename current 'expand' to something else and current
> > 'expand-with-default' to 'expand'. This way you won't have to rewrite any
> > tests.
>
> Perfect. A small issue only: the current "expand" should be a local rule,
> but I guess you can explicitly import it into the test-space.

Yea. Who's gonna make this change? (We can just enter an issue and do it 
later, btw)

- Volodya