Re: [jamboost] Progress on issue 578618: Leave jamfile modules for user.

From: Rene Rivera (grafik666_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-05 10:55:30

[2002-07-08] Vladimir Prus wrote:

>Rene Rivera wrote:
>
>> >1. Maybe, we should move all project-root related data into separate
>>
>> object,
>>
>> >so that proejct root module namespace be clean as well.
>> >
>> >2. We'd need to make the "use-project" rule available in project root
>> >namespace. (I'll document that rule in the user docs soon. You can refer
>> > to the thread starting with
>> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jamboost/message/1320 meanwhile)
>> >
>> >3. We'd need to import non-local rules from project root module into
>>
>> jamfile
>>
>> >modules.
>> >
>> >For me, it seems like a number of changes involving project-root.jam.
>> > Rene, do you have any spare time to work on this and/or discuss #1.
>> > Actually #1
>>
>> is
>>
>> >the most complex thing here, I think.
>>
>> I'll take a brief look at it, but I don't think it's as hard as you make
it
>> seem ;-) But I won't have time for it until later this week... maybe
>> Wednesday, most likely Thursday.
>
>Actually, these change are pretty much independent of all the rest, so even 
>next Monday would be OK, IMO. 
>(I'm hoping we can start thinking about generators on the next week)
>If you decide to implement it, please add a test for 'use-project' in
project 
>root file to project_test3.py.
>(I'm about to commit the 'use-project' docs in a few minutes).

I know I'm really late with these... but I was about to commit the changes
and ran into one snag... The project_test1 test fails for me. I'm not sure
it's anything I did as it's failing with incorect paths which is something I
didn't change. Question: Does this test still work for either of you?

-- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- rrivera_at_[hidden] - grafik_at_[hidden]
-- 102708583_at_icq - Grafik666_at_AIM - Grafik_at_[hidden]